Does this mean that we should cull poor people?
In fact, why not? After all, they do tend to have unpleasant table manners & interesting skin conditions brought on by the combination of an atrocious diet & too much sata-lout TV
« On This Day ... in 1813 & Others | Main | & now a slight re-working of an old classic »
In fact, why not? After all, they do tend to have unpleasant table manners & interesting skin conditions brought on by the combination of an atrocious diet & too much sata-lout TV
Comments
Back in the 1960's LBJ declared "A War on Poverty".
Poverty won that one. Having learned a lesson, Obama declared "A War on Wealth." He is finding that fairly easy to do.
Posted by: toad | July 30, 2009 2:47 AM
Yep, feed the homeless to the hungry.
The US has spent over $7 trillion in the War on Poverty and poverty still won. The poverty rate hasn't departed much from 12% in the past 30 years.
Never mind that our poor have a car, two television sets, $150 basketball shoes, $200 cell phones, and smoke $150 worth of cigarettes a month.
Posted by: POWinCA | August 2, 2009 8:53 AM