Cleaning up after the hippies
As was so correctly pointed out in the comments about yesterday’s summer solstice post, the New Age hippy drippy dope smoking scarifies are more than ready or bang on about the environment & yet they take every opportunity to treat it with the utmost contempt
Sadly, it reminds of the last Countryside Alliance march in London when half a million of us wurzels went to protest about the Hunting Ban: afterwards there was simply no litter dumped on the streets. This surprised some commentators but to be honest, not me. However when you look at how these ‘worshippers’ treat an archaeological site of global importance...
... it is worth recalling that there are countrymen & those that go to the country. Never ever get the two confused
If it were down to me, next year would simply be cancelled already. That is how you would deal with children - you treat them like children & if these people don’t have enough respect to take their litter home then why should the taxpayer have to foot the cleanup bill?
Mind you, given that over thirty people got themselves arrested – a figure which is far too low in my humble opinion – I feel strongly that following a swift appearance in front of the Beak they could be quite usefully put to work spend the rest of this week clearing the place up. I know I know, that could be considered to be degrading & infringing their so-called Human Rights – well the alternative is that instead of the Beak, dissenters & their barrack room lawyers could have their cases elevated to be heard by Hanging Judge Free Market's Bloody Assizes – trust me, in that instance, these scumbags wouldn’t be putting rubbish into bin liners ... their decomposing remains would be found in them
Comments
Napalm is the answer...35000 crusties turned to ash and the stones would still stand as always.
Posted by: thud | June 23, 2009 12:35 AM
Man alive, not so uptight Mr. FMFT, think of your own no doubt ill-spent youth and also think of all the hippie chick banging that went on. A little litter is a small price to pay.
As for why should the taxpayer pay, well look at his record, the taxpayer generally votes for the stupidest, most socialist candidate he can find. How many of your stout bulldog business friends voted Labour. Plenty I'll bet.
Posted by: Fred Z | June 23, 2009 12:40 AM
As you well know, there is an army base or 2 nearby, 15 years ago A mate was stationed there, he was a transport driver, mostly those bedford QLs, they were issued with orders NOT to endanger the vehicle by swerving to miss hippies, how things have degenerated?
Posted by: chris Edwards | June 23, 2009 1:47 AM
Hey Thud, although your solution has a certain style, it would be more profitabe to turn them all into Soylent Green.
Posted by: Mant on a Rant | June 23, 2009 7:24 PM
Oh what utter rot, picking up litter is perfectly normal community service and certainly not something the HRA would forbid. That's a strawman if every I saw one.
And if the taxpayer always votes for the biggest socialist, how come the tories only lost power when labour re-invented themselves as being rather less socialist? Surely the 'most socialist candidate' was dear old Neil Kinnock? Ah, but you must forgive me. You can prove anything with facts, can't you?
Like all that global warming nonsense. Anyway, litterers are scum, but it hardly seems fair to blame the hippies at large for it. Do you blame yourself when you walk around your town and see crisp packets on the streets? No? Well why not? You're obviously to blame because you were in more or less the same area and I personally can't distinguish you from your less principled neighbours, so you must be a dirty litterbug? This is how pompous blowhard logic works, isn't it? Correct me if I'm wrong, you are after all the expert.
Posted by: Rapewaffle | June 25, 2009 6:26 PM