« The failure of conservatism | Main | On This Day ... in 1093 & Others »

Of names, Taffies & badgers?

names.JPG

The above photograph appeared on the front page of The Sun a few months ago. Clearly referring to people as ‘Pakis’ is impolite & I used the word impolite deliberately & in preference to ‘offensive’ because just about half the contents of the Oxford Shorter English Dictionary are found to be offensive by someone or other these days.

I seem to recall through the mists of this mornings hangover that local council telly tubbies were banning the use of Latin phrases because Johnny Foreigner can’t manage our language & yet seems to be able to complete a social security claim form with some alacrity. It now transpires that Welsh don’t want to be referred to as British – well at least according to Ron “Badger” Davies.

Somewhat predictably, now that there is a serious bout of feeling aggrieved going around, it was never going to be long before the Taffs got in on the act…

A race relations quango is warning that the word 'British' should be avoided because it is similarly offensive to the words 'negro' and 'half-caste'. According to the publicly funded organisation - headed by disgraced former Cabinet minister Ron Davies - to use the word British 'implies a false sense of unity' that is unwelcomed by people from Scotland, Wales and Ireland

As for the Welsh getting upset about being refered to as British etc, the moment that they stop accepting huge handouts from the English taxpayer, that can call themselve whatever they want, even if that word has lots of double f’s & no recognisable vowels in it. We wont be able to hear their persistent whinging because we will have dug out Offa’s dyke & blown both the Severn Bridge & the Second Severn Crossing. In any case, who cares about what the Welsh do or do not think, not even the French...

Children cheered, bugles sounded and the Prince of Wales inspected the guard, yet an air of improvisation tinged the pageantry at President Sarkozy’s ceremony at Verdun to commemorate the 1918 Armistice ...That was not the only hitch. Speaking outside the ossuary that contains the unidentified remains of 130,000 French and German soldiers, Mr Sarkozy hailed Britain’s sacrifice in the Great War. “France will never forget the English, Scottish and Irish soldiers who fought on our soil as if it was their own,” he said. There was no mention of the Welsh, whose Prince, with the Duchess of Cornwall, was present,

As for this non-sensical 'report', it is the usual claptrap but it is not nearly as interesting as its author, Ron Davies. In September 1998 Davies was Secretary of State for Wales when he defeated Rhodri Morgan to become Labour's candidate for First Secretary of the Welsh Assembly. A month he resigned this post, two days after resigning as Secretary of State. He stood down citing "an error of judgment" in agreeing to go for a meal with a man he had met while walking on a part of Clapham Common, well-known as meeting place for homosexuals looking for casual sex. He was mugged at knifepoint. The full details of the incident which he euphemistically called a "moment of madness" didn’t emerge at first while the Nu Labour spin machine tried to cover up the story. Davies later acknowledged that he had been bisexual for some time, and was receiving treatment for a personality disorder which led him to seek sex in risky situations.

However, like so many Nu Labour politicians, they get to make more comebacks than Lazarus & the story only gets better when they rise from the political grave – Mandy is a classic case in point & so is Davies…

Just before the 2003 Welsh Assembly elections it came out that Davies had been visiting a well-known ‘dogging’ spot near a motorway lay-by. When challenged as to what he had been doing there, Davies initially denied being there for causal sexual encounters & said that he had been going for a short walk, adding: "I have actually been there when I have been watching badgers." I promise you, I am making none of this up.

So Davies with his predilection for errrrrrr Meles meles, is now trying to dictate how we speak ? Who says that governments don’t have a sense of humour?

Comments

"I've been watching badgers"
should rate as one of this
decade's best quotes, right
along with "Don't Tase me, bro!"

Thanks for the handy guide....I am a little upset however that my fellow scousers are not represented.

So we can go back to calling them sheep shaggers then?

When this story was printed in 'The Daily Express' it was followed by statements from a number of Welshman disgusted by this PC nonsense.

But facts have never got in the way of a good Taff bashing on this blog! I notice our Grand Slam victory this year has gone un-noticed. Hmmmm.

Anyway i'm a proud to be British and proud to be Welsh. When I have to tick which race I am on a form I always choose British because my heritage is Welsh, English and Irish. Isnt that what the unions all about?

As a Welshman I don't mind being described as British, but I find being called European bloody insulting. But I doubt if gay boy Ronnie & co would ever dream of trying to get this word banned.

Forgive an ignorant Septic, but WTF is a "Pikey"?

DW

Pikey is a pejorative term for gipsy

Thank you, sir.

Not common knowledge, but we do have Gypsys in the States. Commonly heavily into con games and fraud. (At the risk of stereotyping. I suspect those who are not, do not regard themselves as Gypsys.)
Oddly enough, the recent cable television program "The Riches" on the subject stars Minnie Driver and Eddie Izzard, speaking with Amurcan acccents. (Although Ms Driver manages that one better than Ms Izzard.)

Considering that "Pakistan" is an acronym of Punjab, Afghania, Kashmir, Sindh, and Baluchistan, it seems odd to consider "Paki" a derisive term.

Of course, any descriptive term can be benign or insulting depending upon the intent of the speaker or the sensitivity of those described. The British used the term "Yankee" to derisively describe Americans, a word we still wear with pride.

When I refer to "Brits", I neither intend offense nor do I think any offense is taken.

Germans called us "Amis" and I still can't figure out whether that was a term of affection or an insult.

As for banning Latin phrases for the semi-literate, it seems to me that teaching and learning those phrases would clear up much of the confusion. Along the way, they might actually come to understand the meaning of a Post Hoc ergo Propter Hoc fallacy and recognize when politicians are lying to them.

Post a comment