The missile shield … why we must love it!
Far be it for your humble correspondent set out, in something approaching a coherent argument, the advantages of ballistic missile shields, I thought this morning dear readers we would just review, very briefly some of the advantages of the aforementioned weapons systems if for no other reason, than they are back in the news again.

Firstly, lets be clear – THEY DON’T WORK – however since when has a system actually been required to be working before billions of dollars/pounds are poured into it? Anyone for Bowman?
A textbook study of poor procurement the Bowman radio system takes some beating. The system was supposed to be in service back in the early 1990s. Its cost was going to be £1.9bn, which then escalated to £2.4bn. Five years after the contract had been re-tendered to a new consortium in 2000, the Director of Infantry was still reportedly said to have told his staff he had been forced to accept it with all its faults "for political reasons". On some settings, the user was getting radiation burns. The set weighs 15lbs, three times the weight of its 1960s predecessor, the Clansman. It can’t work in anything armoured. It breaks Land Rover axles. And a store of them overheated and burned down a barracks.
Lets be honest here, half of the stuff that supposedly won the Cold War never worked … nor will it. That’s not the point. The opposition bankrupted themselves building their own non-working weapons systems to try & keep up with our non working weapons systems. This is how bloated capitalists wage war – same spending programmes but with greater shareholder returns. Don’t believe me ? Worried about the direction of The War of Terror? Then you should be buying Halliburton or BAe stock.
Now before we all get marooned in the doldrums waiting for President Ahmejackets 'Flames of Islam' rockets to consume us all, lets take a little look at what the Son of Star Wars ABM systems can do …
1. Liberals hate it. That in itself should be enough reason to take all the money that is wasted on the AIDS riddled starving of Africa - who are going to die anyway, no matter how many photo opportunities aging Irish pop stars host - & spend it on the latest Dr Stangelove slingshot.
2. The Russians hate them as well ... despite testing a modernised anti-ballistic missile of its own. Nothing like a bit of Kremlin double standards to bring back memories of the old days, eh dear readers?
3. Greenpeace are against it ... yet another reason to pour the money into the programme
4. As are the French ...
In speech after speech, Continental politicians—led by French President Jacques Chirac—have accused the United States of seeking to shear off pro-American allies like Britain and Poland and once again split "Old" and "New" Europe, as during the Iraq War. Why, they complain, wasn't the European Union fully consulted? The new ABM system, they say, is evidence that America has not yet mended its unilateralist ways.
So it has cost hundreds of billons of dollars & will cost yet more, but the liberal left, the Rooooooskis, Greenpeace & the Crazy Frog are all against it. Sounds reasonable value for money to me!
Comments
They didn't want cruise missiles at Greenham and Molesworth either. And the Germans did not want tactical nukes in their back yard either. Ton quote a frenchman, la plus ca change, la plus c'est la meme chose.
Posted by: bill | May 8, 2007 7:00 PM