« Eye in the sky | Main | A snapshot of Britain »

Air travel & greenhouse gases

The miseries are at it again: sackcloth on & suitably covered in ashes they are harping on about the latest greatest threat to our way of life seeing as how we have managed to survive bird flu / SARS / giant lumps of space rock / ebola / the James Last Orchestra farewell tour … yep it’s the turn of cheap air travel …

Britain will not be able to meet its goals on climate change without curbing the demand for air travel, according to an Oxford University report. The government is aiming for a 60% cut in carbon dioxide emissions by 2050. But the report's authors say the UK is becoming "air dependent" and government policies on increasing air travel contradict that stated aim … currently aircraft produce 5.5% of UK emissions

The report, entitled “Predict & Decide: Aviation, Climate Change and Policy, comes as a number of UK airports are investing in new facilities to boost passenger numbers. The Oxford team notes that airport expansion was backed in the recent Aviation White Paper, which aims to increase the number of passenger movements in UK airports from about 200m per year now to about 470m by 2030. The government has to confront the contradictions in its policies," said project leader Dr Brenda Boardman, from Oxford University's Environmental Change Institute. Unless the rate of growth in flights is curbed, the UK cannot fulfill its commitments on climate change.

So what if the climate changes because of aircraft emissions. Climate change is nothing new. So what if sea levels rise & some cows in Bangladesh drown? They probably had foot & mouth disease anyway: that coupled with a deep inferiority complex brought on by the Bangladeshi cricket teams current lack of sporting success. The cows were going to die anyway & it doesn’t matter how many appeals you have to buy replacement cows, they too will die … that’s way its called the third world.

According to reports on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme yesterday, it is all the fault of the middle class (no surprises there)… flying off to their holiday homes in Tuscany. Clearly the Environmental Change Unit feels that the factory worker flying down to Spain for two weeks lager & sunburn is OK but the company director going his gite in the Dordogne needs to be vilified. Its not as if travel broadens the horizons as well as bringing people from different countries together – how on earth are we supposed to be good EU serfs if we cant get a cheap weekend to Brussels to marvel at the edifice that our political masters have created in our name?

But rather than face reality, environmental activists with their close allies in the charity industry would much much rather be trying to beat up on holiday makers & buying cows for Bangladeshi villages so that they can be Seen to be Doing Something while showing to all & sundry, how much they Care. They don’t actually want to create jobs in third world countries or enable struggling economies to grow– oh no – what they want on an endless seam of starving recipients for their largess.

Comments

So as a leading university, Oxford I am sure it relies on a certain amount of foreign students enrolling to keep the coffers topped up. I wonder if they took an ethical stance & said that no students could fly to the uk, if the university would survive for long.

Post a comment