‘Tory Boy’ Cameron
As a disaffected Tory voter, I suppose that by default that I fall into one of the groups that the Conservative Party must target if it is to have any chance at the next Cameron v Brown General Election. Despite having beaten David Davis by 134,000 votes to 64,000 in the Tory leadership contest, I freely confess to having more than just a few misgivings about Tory Boy when I hear comments like
"I want us to give our country a modern compassionate Conservatism."
Call me an old dyed in the wool Thatcherite, but what poor old Albion needs is a lot less bleeding heart compassion nonsense & a great deal more individual freedom. Surveying the entire spectrum of British politics, there isn’t a single political party that is committed to rolling back state interference in peoples every day lives & mores the shame for that.
Ever quick with the touchy feely soundbite, Cameron thinks that
"People in this country are crying out for a Conservative Party that is decent, reasonable, sensible, common sense and in it for the long term of this country and that is the party we are going to build"
which means what exactly? I am not sure if it just me, but during the seven month leadership campaign remain pretty sure that to date I haven’t heard a single specific policy from him – how very very Blairite.
Perhaps my greatest misgivings over Cameron relate to his experience. With only four years experience as an MP & even less as Shadow Education Secretary will he have what it takes to weather the forthcoming storm from the Nu Labour spin & media manipulation machine?
In the complete absence of any hard & fast policy specifics, what do we really know about the boy wonder? Well, born in 1966, David William Duncan Cameron, he shares names with two other recent Tory leaders – William Vague & the quiet man Ian Duncan Smith – both of whom enjoyed such overwhelming electoral success … not! So, we can’t take any heart in his given names bestowing any great political legacy, despite having a number of former MPs as ancestors (his great, great, great grandfather, William Mount, was Conservative MP for the Isle of Wight in the 19th Century. Cameron's great, great grandfather, also called William Mount, sat for Newbury, before passing the seat on to his son Sir William Mount, the first baronet & Cameron's great grandfather. ) Hardly man of the people sort of stuff is it?
After prep school & Eton, he read Philosophy, Politics and Economics at Oxford where he definitely absolutely didn’t do any drugs which must have set him somewhat apart from his peers & the peerage in particular. However, he did find time to be a member of the Bullingdon dining club, which is noted for its hard drinking & generally robust behaviour. So maybe Cameron agrees with my little Toni’s changes to the UK’s licensing legislation … but he wouldn’t be drawn on that particular point, or any other point come to that.
After getting his degree Cameron with the benefit of his experience of errrrrrrrr spending three months in Hong Kong, working for a shipping agent, he went to work for the Conservative Party’s Research Department – briefing such highly successful politicians as John Major, before going to work for that paradigm of financial virtue, then Chancellor Norman Lamont as a political adviser just as sterling went into free fall over its exit from the European Exchange Rate Mechanism & Black Wednesday plunged the country into recession. Lets just hope for all our sakes that Norman didn’t teach him any fiscal tricks.
In the finest traditions of the perennially ambitious, Cameron decided to go into industry - but not for him the drudgery of a West Midlands metal basher or the cut & thrust of a City trading floor - oh no – much better to spend seven years at Carlton, as head of corporate communications because that gives you a lot of exposure of real life. Whilst Carlton boss Michael Green rated him,
"I tried to persuade him that he could have a really good career in industry, but he was completely resolute about going back to politics, and I respected him for that. He's good, he's the real McCoy,"
one or two of the journalists that dealt with him had a slightly different perspective, Jeff Randall of the Daily Telegraph famously commented that said he would not trust Cameron
"with my daughter's pocket money" &
"To describe Cameron's approach to corporate PR as unhelpful and evasive overstates by a widish margin the clarity & plain-speaking that he brought to the job of being Michael Green's mouthpiece. In my experience, Cameron never gave a straight answer when dissemblance was a plausible alternative, which probably makes him perfectly suited for the role he now seeks: the next Tony Blair,"
The Sun’s business editor is unsurprisingly a little more forthright about this part of Cameron’s career, describing him as a
"poisonous, slippery individual".
which is I admit a little rich coming from a tabloid journalist, but whatever. If Cameron does in fact possess those two qualities then he is superbly equipped to be an MP.
However, scanning though all he has done thus far I see little to give me confidence that he has ever had any contact with what those of us mere mortals might consider to approximate to reality. Time will tell & todays Prime Minster’s question time will be very very interesting. For me, the jury is still out & I remain sceptical that he has what it takes to return a Conservative government to power. I am however absolutely convinced that Cameron has what it takes to turn the Tory party into a slightly better spoken version of Nu Labour which we collectively need like a hole in the head.
Comments
I wrote about that phrase here.
I already hate your ideas, Mr Cameron. If anyone ever says the phrase "modern, compassionate conservatism" anywhere near me, I'll have them locked up.
DK
Posted by: Devil's Kitchen | December 7, 2005 12:50 PM
Let me begin by saying I'm a Yank, just to avoid confusion regarding my "MP" signature. I heard young Mr Cameron on the BBC American service yesterday rattling on about how his party had far too many white males in positions of power or serving as Members of Parliament. Like so many white male American politicians, he apparently wants to be the last white with a set of b@lls elected to office. Personally for me that in and of itself would be a deal-breaker. My advice - keep an eye on that little w@nker.
Posted by: M.P. | December 7, 2005 4:54 PM
The election of Cameron has ensured that I won't be returning to the "Conservative" Party any time soon.
If Cameron does return the "Conservative" Party to power it certainly won't be with conservative policies.
Is this the death of conservatism in mainline politics, or did it happen much earlier? Certainly the nail in the coffin.
Posted by: Mark | December 7, 2005 4:56 PM
Ah yes. Compasssionate Conservatism. We have had eight years of that here, in America, and all it is is a mixture of maybe Conservatism with Libralism mixed in. Believe me you folks do not need it.
Posted by: DE644 | December 7, 2005 8:07 PM
Obviously having Prime Ministers questiontime on the radio in her Hairdressers' was enough to send the Iron Lady a perm over the edge. If you cannot spin in your grave then spinning under the dryer must come a close second in showing your disapproval of such front bench chuminess!!
Posted by: hugh | December 8, 2005 10:58 AM
I have mixed views on all this.
On the one hand it is nice to see the Tories looking happy amd confident for a change. However I am not convinced by the touchy feely hot air emanating from DC and his supporters.
After all what is "compassionate conservatism". Does it mean handing out money willy nilly regardless of the cost or cause? I hope not.
Are we meant to infer that Conservatives have not been compassionate before? If so I cannot agree. What about the billions the Tories handed out for one reason or another in the 80s and 90s. I many respects it was easier (short of working for it) to get money out of the state then than it is today.
We should give Mr Cameron et al the benefit of the doubt in the short term but watch them like hawks. What this country cannot afford is for its only serious right of centre party to be shifted left.
Posted by: esbonio | December 8, 2005 5:23 PM