"He was given a three-year community rehabilitation order, put on the sex offenders' register for five years"
And what the (pardon my French, but it is Bastille day) f*ck is a "community rehabilitation order"? Do they take him to toddler's groups and if he doesn't grope anyone under 10 he get's a pat on the back?

This is not unusual behaviour for a paedophile. The weirdo is probably sincerely agrieved, sees no reason why he lost his job, and is in complete denial.
This is why paedophiles are so dangerous.

Why is that piece of shit still breathing?

How about he donate ten thousand pounds, fifteen years of his life behind bars and a couple of body parts, like his testicles?

His dismissal was UNFAIR? On what grounds? That he had advice from NAMBLA? (trust me, these parasitic perverts exist and they are a cancer that needs to be exiled to a deserted island)

We have a similar story starting on this side of the pond.

An editor for the publishing company that puts out the venerable Weekly Reader newspaper for schoolchildren was arrested on charges he solicited sex from a minor on the Internet.
Noel Neff, an editor at Stamford, Conn.-based Weekly Reader Corp., was arrested Saturday in a mall parking lot, where authorities said he had arranged to meet and have sex with someone he thought was a 14-year-old boy named Chris.

Fortunatley, this dirtbag was met by FBI agents in a sting operation. Which means the FBI will be sued for entrapment and then Mr. Noel Neff , the SIQ (Scumbag In Question) will surely sue his former employer and everyone he can think of.

They say things are getting better. What do THEY know?

Easy answer - someone post the SIQ's address and, when he disappears a week after, no-one worries about his health.

Rule of law? We don't need no steenkin' rule of law...

I'm good friends with Noel Neff, the SIQ you mentioned.

Not only does he NOT have a criminal record, he was never arrested or charged with a crime until the fbi nabbed him.

When you read the transcripts (as I had access to reading), there are several areas in question from the FBI agent (posing as a 14 year old) that were bait tactics which Noel Neff did not fall for.

The fact that he agreed to meet the kid was the only mistake he made. When the FBI attempted to convince Mr. Neff that Noel should get a hotel room for them, Noel refused and only agreed to meet in a public place and would not go anywhere else with the teenager/fbi agent.

I don't agree with how we allow police to pose as teenagers online; I agree we should stop pedophiles from attacking children, but a teen is not a child and Mr. Neff was never charged with being a pedophile though people like Oprah Winfrey and the media get that confused all the time. Teens should be parented properly and shouldn't have access to online predators. If they do have access from home, then parents should be monitoring their activities.

Get the facts before you condemn someone...just a reminder that he was charged with "Intent to engage in sex with a minor". He didn't actually do anything like the previous pedophile you mentioned.

About those facts you menioned........

BOSTON - It took a federal jury less than two hours today to convict former Weekly Reader editor Noel Neff on Internet child predator charges.

Neff showed no emotion after the jury returned the guilty verdicts early Thursday afternoon. U.S. District Judge George O'Toole Jr. revoked Neff's bond and marshals led the former children's magazine editor out of the courtroom in handcuffs.

Neff faces a minimum of five year, and up to 60 years, in prison on the charges. He is expected to be sentenced Sept. 14.

The jury found Neff, 47, of Norwalk, guilty on both charges of using the Internet to lure a minor to engage in sexual activity and traveling across state lines to engage in sexual conduct with a minor.

Neff was fired from the Stamford children's publisher after his July 9 arrest in Franklin, Mass., where he allegedly believed he would meet an adolescent named "Chris" he had met online. "Chris" was actually a Boston FBI agent posing as a 14-year-old boy with homosexual feelings.

After Neff initiated contact with "Chris" in April 2005 in an Internet chat room, they began exchanging e-mails and instant messages that were often about sex, according to court testimony this week. In online discussions before July 9, Neff allegedly said he couldn't say he was meeting "Chris" for sex but would let "Chris" make the first move.

When Neff arrived at the specified shopping center in Franklin, instead of meeting "Chris," he was placed under arrest by three FBI agents.

Neff's lawyer argued that his client was not seeking sex from "Chris" and based on evidence presented yesterday, would not have had time to act on the criminal behavior he is charged with.

Neff's lawyer, Francis O'Reilly of Fairfield, said his client never committed a criminal act and was only trying to share his insight as a sexually confused teenager with someone he thought was going through the same experience.